A New Braunfels ISD teacher was reassigned to an alternative center in a dust-up over TAKS scores at her campus. She claimed the principal placed so much pressure on the teachers to bring in high scores that at one point he even threatened to "kill" her if her students' TAKS performance wasn't up to his expectations.
She filed a police complaint for assault. She also filed a grievance asking to be returned to an assignment on a regular campus.
Last night the NBISD board heard her grievance and after an apparently long deliberation, denied the request for reassignment. The brief news report is here.
That's the trouble with grievances. They are limited in what they can accomplish - limited by the common sense, moral compass, and quality of advice received by the people hearing the grievance. Even if the NBISD board agreed with this teacher that the principal was way, way out of line for making the comment, the remdy available to the teacher is subject to very wide discretionary latitude. It would be perfectly okay for the board to have said "we agree with you that the comments shouldn't have been made, and we're even going to take the initiative to reprimand the prinicpal for making them, but we're going to leave you in the new assignment anyway."
Some complaints do have clear remedies that are backed by legal principals, but many don't. The right to be heard is not always paired with a rght to put everything back the way it was.
By the way, did anyone get the song reference in the title to this post?

Recent Comments